Articles Written by:    ANNE ESSON     

« Previous  |  Next »

Vail Daily letter: Supports Hidden Gems

I write to support the Hidden Gems Campaign to designate as wilderness areas such Eagle County parcels as Spraddle Creek, Mt. Thomas, and Deep Creek. As a monitor of rare plants for Betty Ford Alpine Garden, as a spotter of invasive, noxious weeds ...

From ANNE ESSON VAIL, CO, COLORADO, Vail Daily,  18 Aug 2009
Related Topics: Betty Ford

Thanks ski companies

The volunteers of Friends of the Eagles Nest Wilderness has received a grant in the amount of $10,000 from the National Forest Foundation Ski Area Program to again attack noxious weeds in the Eagles Nest Wilderness and adjacent areas of the White ...

From ANNE ESSON VAIL, CO, COLORADO, Vail Daily,  2 Jul 2009
Related Topics: Vail Resorts, Inc.,  United States Forest Service

Getting weeds out of Vail

On Friday, Sept. 14, Vail Mountain School 11-year-olds spent the morning pulling invasive weeds at Donovan Pavilion, much to the joy of fellow weed volunteers from the Friends of the Eagles Nest Wilderness and of Gregg Barrie of town of Vail, Public ...

From ANNE ESSON, Vail Daily,  28 Sep 2008

Letter: Eagle River efforts paying off

Anne Esson Vail CO, Colorado May 27, 2008 Comments Print Email Thanks very much for the editorial stance advocating a higher water quality standard for the Eagle River. What a shot in the arm for the Watershed Councils effort to convince a rather ...

From ANNE ESSON, Vail Daily,  27 May 2008

Letter: Ginn 'Chateau' ridiculous

Anne Esson Vail, CO Colorado February 18, 2008 Comments Print Email The proposed Ginn “Chateau” at Cross Creek is indeed an iconic monument — to human stupidity, namely our failure to understand our place in the natural world and our continued ...

From ANNE ESSON, Vail Daily,  18 Feb 2008

« Previous  |  Next »

Who is This?

Help us add to our database, by linking this writer their entry in Wikipedia or Source Watch, or by suggesting that we remove it from our index.

Suggest an Entry

Enter a url from sourcewatch.org or wikipedia.org:


recommend removal

close